Hamlet is not a Playwright by Shakespeare

 Hamlet is not a Playwright by Shakespeare

Direction, Compose, Spectators

            Hamlet, written by Shakespeare, is well composed play in the history of Elizabethan drama.  It is obvious that Hamlet prince of Denmark can’t write or give directions  professionally but Shakespeare can do it because he is successful playwright of that particular age. There are several aspects under consideration.

First, Hamlet states that dialogue delivery shouldn’t be too tamed, but let their own discretion be their tutor. They suit action to the words and words to the action. He advises that with this special overstep is not the modesty of nature.

Second, it acquires and begets a temperance that may give it smoothness while performing play on the stage for their particular audience.

Third, it offends him to the soul to hear a fellow tear a passion to tatters or to split the ears of the groundlings.

Forth, they are capable of nothing but inexplicable dumb shows and noise.

Gillian Woods explores how the play unsettles distinctions between performance and reality and how it thus exposes the mechanisms of theatre.
            Hamlet is told a prince who is student in university, a learned and a scholar person. He is successor of the kingdom. It seems out of question to know in detail about how to perform dialogues and how to act a play very well. Besides a prince can have interest to see drama but he doesn’t know in detail about the audience what type of they are actually. All these can be known by Shakespeare but not Hamlet. It is concluded that there are autobiographical elements in the play.

Hamlet may see stage drama performance. It is possibility also that he knows well about the audience, their expectations from players and writers as well. But he can’t be a part of directors or players who perform on stage very well.